|
Grundlagen | 'face' | FTAs: neg.-H-face / pos.-H-face / S-face / strategies | strategy selection | Bsp: bald / pos. |
on record | An actor goes on record in doing an FTA if it is clear to participants what communicative intention led the actor to do A (i.e. there is just one unambigously attributable intention with which witnesses would concur). - 'I (hereby) promise to come tomorrow' |
off record | In contrast, if an actor goes off record in doing A, then there is more than one unambigously attributable intention so that the actor cannot be held to have committed himself to one particular intent. |
| Doing an act baldly, without redress, involves doing it in the most direct, clear, unambigous and concise way possible (for eaxample, for a request, saying 'Do X!'). This we shall identify roughly with following the specifications of Grice's Maxims of Cooperation (Grice 1967, 1975) suspended:
|
| By redressive action we mean action that 'gives face' to the addressee, that is, that attempts to counteract the potential face damage of the FTA by doing it in such a way, or with such modifications or additions, that indicate clearly that no face threat is intended or desired … |
| Positive politeness is oriented toward the positive face of H, the positive self-image that he claims for himself. PP is approach-based; |
| Negative politeness, , is oriented mainly toward partially satsifying (redressing) H's negative face, his basic want to maintain claims of territory and self-determination. NP avoidance-based
characertized by self-effacement, formality & restraint hedges on the illocutionary force |
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge University Press |
W. Grießhaber 2003-2005 |